在职考研辅导班-在职MBA考研培训班报名入口-考研网校
您现在的位置:首页 > 备考 > 考研真题 >

2021年考研英语(一)阅读理解AText 2试卷答案(郑州考研网)

来源: 考研网校     2021-05-19 14:09     点击:   次

  Text 2

  Last year marked the third year in a row that Indonesia’s bleak rate deforestation has slowed in pace. One reason for the turnaround may be the country’s antipoverty program.

  In 2007, Indonesia started phasing in a program that gives money to its poorest residents under certain conditions, such as requiring people to keep kids in school or get regular medical care. Called conditional cash transfers or CCTS, these social assistance programs are designed to reduce inequality and break the cycle of poverty. They are already used in dozens of countries worldwide. In Indonesia, the programme has provided enough food and medicine to substantially reduce severe growth problems among children.

  But the CCT programs don’t generally consider effects on the environment. In fact, poverty alleviation and environmental protection are often viewed as conflicting goals, says Paul Ferraro an economist at Johns Hopkins University.

  That’s because economic growth can be correlated with environmental degradation, while protecting the environment is sometimes correlated with greater poverty. However, those correlations don’t prove cause and effect. The only previous study analyzing causality, based on an area in Mexico that had instituted CCTs, supported the traditional view. There, as people got more money, some of them may have more cleared land for cattle to raise for meat, Ferraro says.

  Such programs do not have to negatively affect the environment, though. Ferraro wanted to see if Indonesia’s poverty-alleviation program was affecting deforestation. Indonesia has the third-largest area of tropical forest in the world and one of the highest deforestation rates.

  Ferraro analyzed satellite data showing annual forest loss from 2008 to 2012—including during Indonesia’s phase-in of the antipoverty program—in 7, 468 forested villages across 15 provinces. “We see that the program is associated with a 30 percent reduction in deforestation”, Farrow says.

  That’s likely because the rural poor are using the money as makeshift insurance policies against inclement weather, Ferraro says. Typically, if rains are delayed, people may clear land to plant more rice to supplement their harvest. With the CCTS, individuals instead can use the money to supplement their harvests.

  Whether this research translates elsewhere is anybody’s guess. Ferraro suggests the results may transfer to other parts of Asia, due to commonalities such as the importance of growing rice and market access. And regardless of transferability, the study shows that what’s good for people may also be good for the environment. Even if this program didn’t reduce poverty. Ferraro says, “the value of the avoided deforestation just for carbon dioxide emissions alone is more than the program costs”.

  26. According to the first two paragraph, CCT programmes aim to ________.

网站声明:
(一)由于每年成人高考考试政策都会有所调整和变化,本网站仅提供考试信息供大家参考,具体敬请请以教育考试院及院校官方公布的正式信息为准。
(二)本网注明信息来源为其他媒体的稿件均为转载体,免费转载出于非商业性学习目的,版权归原作者所有,如您对内容、版权等问题存在异议请与本站联系,我们会及时进行处理解决。
广东自考报名
在职考研培训班报名入口
扫码关注
返回顶部